Post by account_disabled on Jan 8, 2024 17:19:37 GMT 7
Aperpetrators of the crimes must not is in an unfavorable situation for the simple fact that the applicable legal regime is different from that applicable in criminal matters. Such a position is natural since otherwise the author of a misdemeanor from the point of view of the legal protection he enjoys would be on a lower level than the author of a crime within the meaning of the Romanian Criminal Code which is inadmissible from since both facts belong to the criminal matter in the sense of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. VIII.
The jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Country Email List Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union . In the Case of Maria Lefter against Romania Application no. . by the Decision of inadmissibility of April the European Court of Human Rights held the following Invoking art. of the Convention the plaintiff invoked the violation of her right of access to the court by canceling the contravention complaint by the court for reasons that according to her opinion were not clearly provided by the law and did not prevent the examination of the case on the merits. Pursuant to art. of the Convention the plaintiff invoked that she did not benefit from an effective appeal to challenge the annulment of the complaint.
The Court found that in the present case the applicant was penalized for contravention on the grounds that she possessed packs of cigarettes the sale of which was prohibited in Romania her cigarettes were confiscated and she was fined EUR . the applicable national law the repressive purpose of the sanction and the very high amount of the fine the Court considered that art. of the Convention is applicable in this case under its criminal aspect Albert v. Romania paragraph . Considering the facts of the case there was an.
The jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Country Email List Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union . In the Case of Maria Lefter against Romania Application no. . by the Decision of inadmissibility of April the European Court of Human Rights held the following Invoking art. of the Convention the plaintiff invoked the violation of her right of access to the court by canceling the contravention complaint by the court for reasons that according to her opinion were not clearly provided by the law and did not prevent the examination of the case on the merits. Pursuant to art. of the Convention the plaintiff invoked that she did not benefit from an effective appeal to challenge the annulment of the complaint.
The Court found that in the present case the applicant was penalized for contravention on the grounds that she possessed packs of cigarettes the sale of which was prohibited in Romania her cigarettes were confiscated and she was fined EUR . the applicable national law the repressive purpose of the sanction and the very high amount of the fine the Court considered that art. of the Convention is applicable in this case under its criminal aspect Albert v. Romania paragraph . Considering the facts of the case there was an.